Thursday, 14 February 2013

Teachers' attitudes towards the new English curriculum in Kurdistan Region/Iraq


 
Master Research Proposal:

Teachers' attitudes towards the new English curriculum in Kurdistan Region/Iraq


Prepared by/
Brwa R. Sharif
 
Near East University
Department of English Language Teaching



Supervised by/

Dr. Çise Çavuşoğlu








Teachers' attitudes towards the new English curriculum in Kurdistan Region/Iraq

Introduction & Background of the Study

         Although English language has been a worldwide language and everyone needs that for communicating around the world, but students in Kurdistan Region/Iraq were not able to speak in English besides studying (old English curriculum which was taught since 1972) at primary and secondary schools. Nowadays speaking a foreign language especially English is very important, because English all over the world is spoken, therefore students in Kurdistan Region/Iraq should learn English language specifically speaking skill because they need speaking to communicate, interact, and also give and receive information, because of these matters a new curriculum of English language (which is called Sunrise) has been created for primary and secondary schools concerning writing, reading, listening, and speaking.

          Sunrise for Kurdistan is a complete English course written especially for primary and secondary school students. The course has a communicative approach, integrating listening, speaking, reading and writing, with a clear focus on grammar structures. It achieves development of English through a fun approach to learning, using motivational topic-based units, adventure stories that introduce new language, and a variety of activities including role plays and guided writing tasks. (Sunrise for Kurdistan)

         As a teacher I have experienced in the schools most of the teachers used old traditional grammarian rules as a means of teaching since 1972, and it was deductive teaching they only focused teaching grammar. Therefore a new curriculum for English as a whole has been designed which is called (Sunrise) and it starts from grade 1 to 12, and it consists all the skills reading, writing, listening, and speaking. Finally, this study focuses on teachers’ attitudes towards ‘Sunrise’.

 

Statement of the Problem & Significance of the Study

                 Curriculum in Kurdistan Region/Iraq was not good enough to teach English, because it was created more than forty years ago, and it has not fulfilled the new generations’ needs concerning speaking and listening. As a result of that matter, fortunately Ministry of Education in Kurdistan Region has changed the old English book into a new one concerning content and all the skills. So now the curriculum consists (Sunrise) from level 1-12, so the students should study new English curriculum (Sunrise) from the first grade to twelfth grade.

            Changing curriculum, I think, is good especially to develop educational issues in Kurdistan Region. Teachers focused on grammar and written texts, so that the students got high marks regardless speaking and listening. As a result teachers had used the grammar teaching rules in the old English curriculum (Old English curriculum was taught before 2005 in Kurdistan Region), so they are expected to use the same approach as they were used to.

           When the research is done, I will suggest an implication for the Ministry of Education about the new English curriculum to be considered for the result.

 

Research question

1.      What are teachers’ attitudes towards the new English curriculum?

2.      What are teachers’ attitudes towards the new English curriculum concerning age?

3.      What are teachers’ attitudes towards the new English curriculum concerning sex?
 

Aims

               The aim of this study is to find out teachers’ attitudes towards the new English curriculum. It is to find out their attitudes towards that changing of curriculum concerning age and sex, because teachers’ attitudes can be crucial in determining the success and failure of an innovation (Brown and McIntyre 1982, Richardson 1991, as cited in Lee, 2000)

 

Literature review

             Education is the most important thing for the country’s future. And the heart of education is curriculum as it is the content of learning and its organization, the acquisition of learning and the assessment techniques (Karatzia-Stavlioti & Alahiotis, 2007). According to Huberman (1973), change in education may occur in three ways: hardware, that is, additions to school equipment, such as new classrooms, teaching machines, books or playgrounds; software, usually in the content and range of the curriculum, or in the methods of delivery and reception; and as a subcategory of software, which is interpersonal relations, changes in the roles and relationships between teachers and students, between teachers and administrators or teachers and teachers. However in Kurdistan Region we can say that the change is in the curriculum but somehow it is also in interpersonal relations as well.

          School curriculum is something that should be changed systematically, which is one of the ideas of twentieth century’s contributions to education (Kilpatrick, 2009), because if it is sudden change it will create negative attitudes among teachers and students. When curriculum change considered, there is a deliberate attempt to introduce one or more components of the curriculum which are different or new (Everard & Morris, 1996; Markee, 1997). Curriculum change is a subset of educational change (Lovat & Smith, 2003). So the change in curriculum is to improve side effects on the previous curriculum.

             Every change is interpreted by others based on their attitudes (Newstrom & Davis, 1997). The term of attitude can be defined as what people think, feel, and do. According to social psychologists, attitudes consist of three dimensions: (1) cognitive, (2) affective and (3) behavioral (Van der Zander, 1984, cited in KurĢunoğlu, 2006). Teachers’ attitudes can be crucial in determining the success and failure of an innovation (Brown and McIntyre 1982, Richardson 1991, as cited in Lee, 2000), therefore the curriculum designers should pay teachers’ attention.


Methodology

         For this study I will use mixed methods design. And some techniques such as surveys and interviews will be used to collect data. The participants will include English teachers (males and females) in primary and secondary schools in Kurdistan Region/Iraq. I will use questionnaires as a survey study and some materials for interviews such as tape recorders and video recorders. Finally for analysing the data collected I will use the SPSS program concerning statistics and descriptive analysis.

Limitations

          In my study I will focus on teachers (females and males), but not their students and supervisors. And in the study I will include Sulaimani Province in Kurdistan Region to find out the results.

Timeline

Schedule
Duration of the thesis
 
 
Literature Review and writing the research report.
Preparation of data collecting tools.
 
Administering the questionnaires and recording the interviews.
 
Analyzing the data.
 
Finalizing the thesis.
 
 
 
Start
 
End
Has been started
 
July 2013
 
October. 2013
 
December. 2013
January. 2014
 
 
October. 2013
 
December. 2013
 
January. 2014
March. 2014

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reference


Everard, K. B., & Morris, G. (1996). Effective school management. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

Huberman, A. M. (1973). Understanding change in education: An introduction. Experiments and innovations in education(4).

Karatzia-Stavlioti, E., & Alahiotis, S. (2007). Evaluation of a cross-thematic curricular innovation: Teachers attitudes and the flexible zone. The International Journal of Learning, 14(3), 267-275.

Kilpatrick, J. (2009). The mathematics teacher and curriculum change. PNA, 3(3), 107-121.

KurĢunoğlu, A. (2006). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin örgütsel değişmeye karşı tutumları. Pamukkale University. Denizli, Turkey: Unpublished M. Sc. thesis.

Lee, J. C.-K. (2000). Teacher receptivity to curriculum change in the implementation stage: the case of environmental education in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(1), 95-115.

Lovat, T. J., & Smith, D. L. (2003). Action on reflection. Sydney, Australia: Social Science Press.

Mak, B. (2011). An exploration of speaking-in-class anxiety with Chinese ESL learners. System, 39, 202-214.

Sunrise for Kurdistan. (n.d.). (Macmillan Education) Retrieved from SunriseKurdistan.com: http://www.sunrisekurdistan.com/

 

No comments:

Post a Comment